Some time ago we saw how to do with Microstation Geographics V8, and the alternative of importing files of .shp type.
1. Open a .shp file
This is done simply with “file / open” and choosing the shp format. This is opened with read-only attributes, but as if it can be a dwg to dgn.
Bentley did very well this alternative to open files directly, because in addition to the .dgn, .dxf and .dwg already made, you can open cells (.cel), libraries (.dgnlib), redline (.rdl), 3D Studio files (.3ds), SketchUp (.skp), MapInfo (.mif and .tab native format), among others.
Once opened the shape, you can touch objects as if it were a common map.
Viewing the properties table, it can be read the associated .dbf database …wow!
Also by using the “review attributes” command, it is displayed an xfm features table, equivalent to the .dbf data.
2. Calling the reference
Using as reference “file / map manager” it can be called in different ways:
- As image:
- As attributes:
This is a special panel, with which it can be chosen feature classes separately for display in different views, or stockpiled fences.
As a reference map:
Called as reference, it can be controlled the snap option, although an interesting aspect is that as a reference also supports MapInfo files (.tab and .mif).
So once it has been brought through the map manager panel can be switched on or off features, groups of features, layers or feature classes.
3. Save the .shp file
The data is stored in XML format within the dgn, in other words the dgn contains data … the wonder of the implementation known as xfm features.
4. Importing via Interoperability:
One of the advantages of doing this by this via is that you can choose a feature class separately, assigning the attribute type that will be imported as type of line, fill, transparency etc. also if you have a project it can be chosen destination attributes.
This is done via “file / import / gis data”
Similarly it can be exported a service… what means it should be seen by an ESRI user… I have not tried this but I’ll do it one of these days when I have time.
Conclusion:
It is not bad, considering the holds of CAD editing and interoperability with ESRI formats.